Meanwhile, the Washington Post created a small flurry of conversation when it ran a story a few days before the election noting that only two of the eight school board members in Prince George's County, Maryland have college degrees. Does that matter? Tough to say. Personal commitment to a school system may matter more than a college diploma. But if you're in the business of educating kids, it probably doesn't hurt to have a solid education yourself.
It's difficult to consider these questions without understanding the role of school boards. According to a study conducted by American Enterprise Institute Education Policy Studies Director Rick Hess, a contributor to this blog, the amount of time board members spend on school business varies widely between large and small districts. Some board members work less than 15 hours a month, while others work more than 40 hours per month. In small districts, most board members receive no salary or a small stipend. In large districts, about half of board members are paid for their work but less than 8 percent earn more than $15,000 a year.
Some education experts are not fans of school boards. Thomas B. Fordham Institute President Chester Finn, another contributor to this blog, has called them "an anachronism and an outrage." National Journal's sister publication, The Atlantic, published a feature in 2008 with the provocative title, "First, Kill All the School Boards." Others, including the National School Boards Association, say school boards are a critical connection between the community and the public school system and an essential component of democracy.
Do school boards matter? If so, how? What are examples of good school board activities? What education topics should school boards avoid? Do board members need basic qualifications like college degrees or other certificates? Should they be elected or appointed? How do the answers to these questions vary based on region or school district size?
The Grass Isn’t Necessarily Greener
By Kevin Welner
Currently around the nation we see increased mayoral control (e.g., NYC, Boston and Chicago), increased private market control (e.g., New Orleans), and increased control from governors or their appointees (e.g., Michigan and Detroit) – but we don’t see any actual benefits of these different approaches.
Before advocating such a switch away from school board control, we should have at least four goals in mind:
1. Responsiveness to all stakeholder voices.
2. Responsiveness to local contexts and needs.
3. Professional knowledge and competence.
For each of these four goals, I see weaknesses in the system of electing school boards. They are probably strongest when it comes to #2, with a great deal of variation for the other three goals. But I also see weaknesses regarding all four in a system of mayoral control, etc. It’s hard not to think of the old Churchill quote: “democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”
There is, however, one thing that I think we all can agree about: There are few activities less interesting than sitting through a school board meeting.