Skip to main content

Report Levies Unsubstantiated Claims of State Discrimination Against Religious Pre-K Providers

BOULDER, CO (May 1, 2025)—A recent report from the Manhattan Institute asserts that many religious pre-K providers are being unconstitutionally excluded from publicly funded education programs that remain open to other private schools. But incomplete research and methodological flaws render the report of relatively little value to policymakers or the public.

Joshua Weishart of Suffolk University Law School expands on these shortcomings in his review of The Persistence of Religious Discrimination in Publicly Funded Pre-K Programs.

The report’s method―keyword searches and online reviews of statutes, regulations, and websites―did not include confirmation that such policies are being enforced. That is a serious flaw since the U.S. Supreme Court only recently changed its interpretation of the First Amendment’s religion clauses to hold that denying access to religious education providers may result in discrimination.

So, while the report assumes that written policies are still being enforced, a more plausible, benign explanation is that the policies have not yet been updated to reflect the recent Supreme Court decisions. It is common for a law to remain “on the books” even after a judicial decision declares it invalid—an issue that should be addressed but does not necessarily indicate intentional or widespread discrimination.

A serious attempt to determine ongoing practices might use surveys of religious pre-K providers or consultations with school officials to ascertain whether these policies are actively enforced.

Yet even as the report alleges discrimination against religious pre-K schools, who incidentally educate under one percent of all pre-K schoolchildren, it omits any reflection about the openly discriminatory policies and practices of many religious schools enrolling students all the way through 12th grade, who educate far, far more.

As Professor Weishart notes, if the Supreme Court mandates that states accept the creation of religious charter schools later this term, a far deeper discussion on balancing religious freedom and non-discrimination in publicly funded education will be essential.

Find the review, by Joshua Weishart, at:
https://nepc.colorado.edu/review/religion

Find The Persistence of Religious Discrimination in Publicly Funded Pre-K Programs, written by Nicole Stelle Garnett, Tim Rosenberger, and J. Theodore Austin and published by the Manhattan Institute, at https://manhattan.institute/article/persistence-of-religious-discrimination-in-publicly-funded-pre-k-programs

 

NEPC Reviews (https://nepc.colorado.edu/reviews) provide the public, policymakers, and the press with timely, academically sound reviews of selected publications. NEPC Reviews are made possible in part by support provided by the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice: http://www.greatlakescenter.org

The National Education Policy Center (NEPC), a university research center housed at the University of Colorado Boulder School of Education, sponsors research, produces policy briefs, and publishes expert third-party reviews of think tank reports. NEPC publications are written in accessible language and are intended for a broad audience that includes academic experts, policymakers, the media, and the general public. Our mission is to provide high-quality information in support of democratic deliberation about education policy. We are guided by the belief that the democratic governance of public education is strengthened when policies are based on sound evidence and support a multiracial society that is inclusive, kind, and just. Visit us at: http://nepc.colorado.edu